• Home
  • The Mission
  • The Inspired Authors
  • Contact
24 Apr 2012
2

Chivalry Dead or Modified?

by YungestInCharge

I’ve been going back and forth with this argument for the past few months or so. I’ve heard many different opinions upon the subject from both sides of the gender pool and have gotten varying responses all over. So let me go ahead and analyze this a little and leave it up to you all to decide and tell me how you feel about it. Let me start with the literal meaning of the word:

“When examining medieval literature, chivalry can be classified into three basic but overlapping areas:

  1. Duties to countrymen and fellow Christians: this contains virtues such as mercy, courage, valor, fairness, protection of the weak and the poor, and in the servant-hood of the knight to his lord. This also brings with it the idea of being willing to give one’s life for another’s; whether he would be giving his life for a poor man or his lord.
  2. Duties to God: this would contain being faithful to God, protecting the innocent, being faithful to the church, being the champion of good against evil, being generous and obeying God above the feudal lord.
  3. Duties to women: this is probably the most familiar aspect of chivalry. This would contain what is often called courtly love, the idea that the knight is to serve a lady, and after her all other ladies. Most especially in this category is a general gentleness and graciousness to all women.

These three areas obviously overlap quite frequently in chivalry, and are often indistinguishable.” (Wikipedia)

So as is the definition it seems we often confuse chivalry with courtly love. Courtly love is defined as “conception of nobly and chivalrously expressing love and admiration.” With that being said, how is it that we came up with the fact that chivalry is dead?

To me it seems like the idea of chivalry is not dead, not being bias and speaking from a man’s perspective only. I have heard from many friends, coworkers, and classmates that are females that agree that it isn’t necessarily a dead concept but it is an altered concept now. Chivalry is no longer the original idea as it was during the medieval times, however it is still alive in modern forms that have changed as the culture and people have changed. As we have become a more independent and more balanced society  in the roles of men and women, the old traditions have changed and adapted with the times. Women are now more independent than ever before and choose to do things more for themselves and are more self dependent.

That doesn’t give men an excuse not to be a gentleman, but some women seem to not want that because they feel that is belittling them back to the old days when women were thought to have been dependent on men. Understanding that chivalry is no longer the same idea it once was is something that plays an important factor in if it is a dead concept or not. Many people believe by altering it from the original state alone makes it a dead concept, and many obviously argue against that. In my opinion I feel chivalry is not a dead concept and I actually side with those that say it has been modernized as we have grown and changed as a society. I won’t divulge to far into this subject because I want to keep this a open discussion topic and get some more varying opinions on it.

Please feel free to say what you think.

Share This
  • http://twitter.com/DachetheJedi Dache

    Its not dead but it has been modified. With all these independent women these days there is only so much a man can do. Courtly love might be gone but chivalry is very alive

  • Clarity Martin

    This is being replaced with symbolic violence(defense) social welfare (aid to dependent children etc.) and from what I understand of the social theories of Robert Bordeaux. The warrior culture has perverted this code into a redefinition of the male gender into  hypermasculinity which defies the actual needs in a post-modern world and destroys the divine aspects of masculinity. The hybridization of Zen (an ancient warrior culture) into western culture as engaged Buddhism(Soolak Shrivarasa) makes efforts to bring the yin and yang into the role of transforming society in a way not defined by renaissance mores and crusades against those outside the posts(progressives pacifists and pagans) of a conformist fascist Protestant Evangelical zeitgeist. Chivalry is not dead, it just smells really bad(Fallujah).

Search

Popular Posts Widget

Plastic Love
9 Comments
The State of American Education
6 Comments
And Why Cant Ron Paul Be President?
5 Comments
News that Inspires Us to tell the true story. Be Inspired